| <- Last |
Ch 1 | Ch 2 |
Ch 3 | Ch 4 | Ch 5 |
Ch 6 Ch 7 | Ch 8 | Ch 9 | Ch 10 | Ch 11 All-In-One | Adobe PDF Format |
Next -> |
![]() |
The Dark Side of Sleeping Pills |
![]() |
| By Daniel F. Kripke, M.D.* |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I have written of the dark side of hypnotics and described the alternative treatment of habits and attitudes, because these are the most important points about sleeping pills. I did not describe benefits until this Chapter 4, because in my view, the risks of sleeping pills are really much more important than the benefits.
A laborious and somewhat misplaced effort has occupied sleep laboratories over the years to measure the small amount by which sleeping pills increase sleep. I will not bore you with the details. The effort is misplaced, in the sense that the prescription sleeping pills increase sleep only a little, so that the exact size of the tiny benefit may be trivial. In most sleep laboratory studies, sleeping pills given to insomniacs increase the duration of sleep only 20-40 min. or even less. This is only a small increase, when we consider that many people who sleep only 5 hours do not complain of insomnia, whereas there are people who sleep 9 hours or more who feel their insomnia is severe. As I have mentioned above, although 20 min. increases in sleep may be statistically significant (which means statistically reliable), they are not functionally significant, since sleeping pills usually produce no measurable improvements in daytime performance.
Zaleplon (Sonata) is an especially unfortunate pill. The official information on this drug stated, “a significant difference from placebo on sleep duration was not demonstrated,” which means that zaleplon generally did not help people sleep more than a dummy pill. Does it make sense to take a hypnotic which does not substantially increase nocturnal sleep? Although this drug might help a person fall asleep 10 minutes faster, possibly it makes sleep worse later the same night, so that total sleep time does not significantly improve.
Zaleplon (Sonata) may NOT significantly increase nightly sleep.
Ramelteon (Rozerem) may offer little risk, but it also offers little benefit. According to the NDA data at the FDA web sites, in many of the company studies, patients who received Rozerem did not think they were sleeping better than those receiving placebo. Rozerem produces a small decrease of time to objective EEG sleep of 7 to16 minutes, which is trivial. However, if many patients taking ramelteon don't feel they are sleeping better, why buy the stuff? Most people would want to feel some benefit from a drug before taking any risk of increasing their chances of developing cancer.
Whereas most sleeping pills increase sleep a few minutes for the
first few nights of use, it is unclear how long the benefits last
with continuous nightly usage. In our Dalmane-midazolam study, the
benefits were gone in less than 7 days as compared to placebo
, and in the
triazolam-flurazepam study, the benefits were gone after 3 weeks as
compared to placebo
. Unfortunately, the majority of
laboratory studies have used placebo baseline recordings as the
control, without counterbalancing the order of placebo and
hypnotic. The studies where hypnotic and placebo are given in
parallel (at the same time to randomly-assigned volunteers) suggest
that participation in laboratory experiments (and spontaneous
recovery) lead to improvements in sleep. After 2-4 weeks, the
improvement seen in a drug-treated group as compared to baseline
may be due to the time-related improvement rather than due to drug
benefit.
When we go beyond 4 weeks, there are few properly controlled
experiments which show that any sleeping pill increases sleep even
a little. One exception of the 8-week study of Morin
. Morin's study, however,
showed that behavioral treatment was as effective as temazepam and
more lasting in its benefit. When we ask whether hypnotic
drugs work when taken nightly for years, there really is no
scientifically convincing evidence of efficacy or benefit.
Again, I wish to emphasize that in general, hypnotics do not improve daytime function. Patients often seek this benefit, but they do not receive it. Further, although we hear colleagues mention that perhaps a patient will be healthier if the patient sleeps better, certainly the CPSI and CPSII mortality data do not support any belief that sleeping pills are useful in the treatment of medical illnesses or in preserving health.
Continued in Chapter 5
| <- Last |
Top of Page | Ch 1 |
Ch 2 | Ch 3 | Ch 4 |
Ch 5 Ch 6 | Ch 7 | Ch 8 | Ch 9 | Ch 10 | Ch 11 All-In-One Page | Adobe PDF (printable) Slide Show Slide Show .PPT Format |
Next -> |
|
The Dark Side of Sleeping Pills, in all its formats,
including this eBook, Copyright ©1997-2008 by Daniel F. Kripke, M.D., all rights reserved. |