<- Last Ch 1 | Ch 2 | Ch 3 | Ch 4 | Ch 5 | Ch 6
Ch 7 | Ch 8 | Ch 9 | Ch 10 | Ch 11
All-In-One | Adobe PDF Format
Slide Show
Slide Show .PPT Format
 
Next -> 
The Dark Side
of Sleeping Pills
By Daniel F. Kripke, M.D.*

Newly Revised: January 2008

CHAPTER 5

RECOMMENDATIONS OF EXPERTS

This little book explains risks of sleeping pills which you may not have heard about. It also describes better alternatives.

 

Table of Contents

In 1979, a distinguished committee of our national Institute of Medicine considered the risks and benefits of hypnotics. Noting concern with the side effects and risks of sleeping pills balanced by the lack of evidence for long-term benefit, this distinguished committee recommended that hypnotics generally be limited to short-term use Footnote - click to read. In 1983, a Consensus Conference held by the National Institutes of Health on the treatment of insomnia. This group recommended that sleeping pills be used mainly for up to 3 weeks, not chronically Footnote - click to read. Another consensus conference was held in 1990 to discuss problems of sleep in aging. Complaints of insomnia are much more common among people above age 60 years, and 40-50% of all sleeping pills are taken in the U.S. by people older than 60. This consensus group also recommended only short-term use of sleeping pills Footnote - click to read. A new committee of the Institute of Medicine concluded in 1997 that the data only supported use of Halcion for two weeks Footnote - click to read. In the summer of 2005, the National Institutes of Health had a consensus conference about insomnia, which emphasized how little we understand about chronic insomnia. This group of experts concluded that the evidence for CBT therapy for chronic insomnia was better than evidence for long-term use of sleeping pills, though this group of experts did not frankly condemn long-term sleeping pill use. In summary, there is expert consensus that the medical evidence does not support chronic use of sleeping pills.

Most recently, a meta-analysis (combined analysis) of a large number of sleeping pill trials was published in the British Medical Journal, one of the most authoritative medical journals. This analysis, focusing on studies of people with insomnia over 60 years of age, concluded that long-term use of sleeping pills more often does harm than good. It would be nice to have a similar analysis for people under 60.

In conclusion, despite the enormous propaganda which results from over half a billion dollars a year spent on sleeping pill marketing, most expert opinion recommends against long-term use of sleeping pills. The opinions voiced in this web book may not be marketed, but most experts without financial ties to the sleeping pill industry have reached the same conclusions:

 

Experts have repeatedly concluded that long-term use of sleeping pills is not advisable.

 

There is no convincing scientific evidence that taking any sleeping pill for years benefits sleep even a little.

 

Continued in Chapter 6 

 

 <- Last Top of Page | Ch 1 | Ch 2 | Ch 3 | Ch 4 | Ch 5
Ch 6 | Ch 7 | Ch 8 | Ch 9 | Ch 10 | Ch 11
All-In-One Page | Adobe PDF (printable)
Slide Show
Slide Show .PPT Format
Next ->
The Dark Side of Sleeping Pills, in all its formats, including this eBook,
Copyright ©1997-2008 by Daniel F. Kripke, M.D., all rights reserved.